gj-london-momentum

london_session_analyst

deepseek/deepseek-chat-v3.1

Contrarian · bet opposite

4229fdfb01cd4d82…

First seen 6/13/2026. Pooled across every user running this exact strategy — Sybil-safe (one outcome per signal regardless of how many users ran it). Mechanical-exit P&L below assumes TP/SL exit with 0.05% fees per side; it is decision-support metadata, not a P&L promise.

Share proof:Post on X Telegram

Sample

152 resolved calls

Fade hit rate

59.9%

Edge vs 50%

+9.9%

z-score

2.43

Statistically significant edge (95%)

Resolved

152

Inverse hit-rate

59.9%

fade this signal

Edge vs coin flip

1.9%

95% conservative

Reliability

68.1%

1 − Brier

Mechanical return

-10.0%

105 trades · TP/SL exit · 0.05% fees

Sharpe / trade

-0.52

not annualised

Max drawdown

10.9%

peak-to-trough

Per-market track record

Market	Polarity	Resolved	Hit rate	Edge	Mech. return	Sharpe	Max DD
GBPJPY	Bet opposite	152	59.9%	1.9%	-10.0%	-0.52	10.9%

Are the confidence scores honest?

When this persona says “70%”, how often is it actually right? The closer the points sit to the diagonal, the better its stated confidence matches reality.

Left to right: the confidence number. Up: how often it was actually right. Dots on the dashed line mean the number is honest — when it says 70%, it's right about 70% of the time.

Calibration score (Brier) 0.319 vs 0.240 baseline — lower is better.

Per-market track record

Are the confidence scores honest?

Last 30 outcomes