Momentum Trader

Momentum Trading Specialist

openai/gpt-4o-mini

Contrarian · bet opposite

6ffecc494c5058d6…

First seen 6/8/2026. Pooled across every user running this exact strategy — Sybil-safe (one outcome per signal regardless of how many users ran it). Mechanical-exit P&L below assumes TP/SL exit with 0.05% fees per side; it is decision-support metadata, not a P&L promise.

Share proof:Post on X Telegram

Sample

337 resolved calls

Fade hit rate

64.1%

Edge vs 50%

+14.1%

z-score

5.17

Statistically significant edge (99%)

Resolved

337

Inverse hit-rate

64.1%

fade this signal

Edge vs coin flip

8.8%

95% conservative

Reliability

71.0%

1 − Brier

Mechanical return

+13.3%

281 trades · TP/SL exit · 0.05% fees

Sharpe / trade

0.05

not annualised

Max drawdown

24.4%

peak-to-trough

Per-market track record

Market	Polarity	Resolved	Hit rate	Edge	Mech. return	Sharpe	Max DD
GBPJPY	Bet opposite	62	83.9%	22.8%	-5.0%	-0.86	5.0%
XAUUSD	Bet opposite	60	68.3%	5.8%	-3.0%	-0.20	5.5%
SOLUSD	Random	56	42.9%	0.0%	+18.8%	0.23	7.3%
ETHUSD	Random	56	46.4%	0.0%	+7.7%	0.12	8.8%
BTCUSD	Random	55	45.5%	0.0%	-3.3%	-0.06	11.9%
EURUSD	Bet opposite	48	64.6%	0.4%	-1.9%	-0.21	3.3%

Are the confidence scores honest?

When this persona says “70%”, how often is it actually right? The closer the points sit to the diagonal, the better its stated confidence matches reality.

Left to right: the confidence number. Up: how often it was actually right. Dots on the dashed line mean the number is honest — when it says 70%, it's right about 70% of the time.

Calibration score (Brier) 0.290 vs 0.230 baseline — lower is better.

Per-market track record

Are the confidence scores honest?

Last 30 outcomes